Valley Independent Sentinel
Communities
Follow Us
We Read…
- Ansonia Football
- Beacon Falls News
- Branford Eagle
- CT Capitol Report
- CT Mirror
- CT News Junkie
- Fireground Images
- La Voz Hispana
- New Haven Independent
- Shelton Trails
- Smartpill Design
Government
- Ansonia
- Derby
- Naugatuck Valley Council of Governments
- Naugatuck Valley Health District
- Oxford
- Seymour
- Shelton
Community
- Ansonia Nature Center
- Ansonia Rotary
- Area Congregations Together
- BHcare
- Boys & Girls Club
- Center Stage
- Community Foundation for Greater New Haven
- Derby Historical Society
- Derby-Shelton Rotary
- Greater Valley Chamber of Commerce
- Greater Valley Salvation Army
- Griffin Hospital
- Housatonic Council, BSA
- John H. Collins Post # 24
- Katharine Matthies Founation
- Literacy Volunteers
- Master’s Table Community Meals
- My First 8
- Osbornedale State Park
- Oxford Historical Society
- Parent Child Resource Center
- Rape Crisis Center
- Seymour Historical Society
- Seymour Lions Club
- Shelton Historical Society
- Shelton Jaycees
- Shelton Land Conservation Trust
- Shelton School Readiness Council
- Shelton Youth Service Bureau
- TEAM
- Valley Arts Council
- Valley Community Foundation
- Valley Council Health & Human Services
- Valley Early Childhood Task Force
- Valley Regional Adult Education
- Valley Substance Abuse Action Council
- Valley United Way
- Valley YMCA
- Visiting Nurse Association of South Central Connecticut
- YEP
Fire Departments
- Charters Hose (Ansonia)
- Citizens Engine (Seymour)
- Derby Fire Department
- Eagle Hose (Ansonia)
- East End Hose (Derby)
- Echo Hose Hook & Ladder (Shelton)
- Fountain Hose (Ansonia)
- Great Hill Hose (Seymour)
- Hilltop Hose (Ansonia)
- Huntington Fire Co. (Shelton)
- Oxford Center Fire Co. (Oxford)
- Pine Rock Co. (Shelton)
- Quaker Farms Fire Co. (Oxford)
- Riverside Fire Co. (Oxford)
- Storm Engine (Derby)
- Webster Hose (Ansonia)
- White Hills (Shelton)
School Districts
Save Our Shelton Opposes Zone Change At Former UI Property
by Save Our Shelton | Letter To The Editor | Nov 28, 2017 10:30 am
() | Commenting has expired | | E-mail the Author
Posted to: Shelton, Letters To The Editor
The following statement was sent to the Valley Indy Tuesday (Nov. 28) by Caitlin Augusta of Save Our Shelton:
Save Our Shelton is opposed to the proposed zone change from Light Industrial to Planned Development District for Planning and Zoning application #17-18 at 801 Bridgeport Avenue at the former United Illuminating property. Our opposition is based on the following factors.
1. While we appreciate the idea of utilizing existing buildings and existing building footprints, we are opposed to a shortsighted plan of development for the city that converts all Shelton’s Light Industrial parcels of land into mixed use and retail. Light Industrial usage provides better paying jobs than retail. Industrial has the benefit of attracting not only businesses but also well paid workers who want to live in Shelton and contribute to our community.
3. We are concerned, if not alarmed at the number of hotels, restaurants, and retail strip malls on Bridgeport Avenue. Yes, Bridgeport Avenue was zoned for development but not development with such a frightening amount of repetitive retail industries. There is one new hotel already approved on Bridgeport Avenue. Is another hotel needed? There are several new restaurants already under construction on Bridgeport Avenue. Are three more needed? There is a retail strip mall under construction at the corner of Bridgeport Avenue and Old Stratford Road and the strip mall at Big Y is just completed. Why is more retail space needed? Given the rise of online shopping and the retail clientele Shelton currently can secure, the proposed retail establishments may not weather a changing retail economy, doing more harm than good to Shelton’s long term economic viability.
4. Traffic is a current problem in Shelton. The number of businesses proposed on the 19 acre UI parcel will guarantee traffic problems in that section of Bridgeport Avenue. Traffic lights will be added and timing intervals will increase as will commute time. Residents already avoid Bridgeport Avenue at peak times, and concomitant problems will create a negative impact on people who seek to travel and do business in those areas. It is poor stewardship to clog Bridgeport Avenue beyond what it can reasonably withstand. Never, in the rush to approve a PDD, is any consideration given to funding more police officers or more fire equipment as new businesses are added.
5. All of these concerns come together to form one conclusion. Residents of Shelton do not wish Bridgeport Avenue to be developed to resemble the Milford/Orange Post Road. In this instance, as in many others, the Planned Development District designation provides few benefits to residents and harms their quality of life. We encourage Planning & Zoning to rethink the PDD designation and place a moratorium on PDDs until more narrow guidelines for its use and benefits can be drafted.
Therefore, Save Our Shelton opposes the Planned Development District application #17-18 at 801 Bridgeport Avenue
Views expressed in letters to the editor and press releases do not necessarily reflect the views of ValleyIndy.org. The Valley Indy has a 550-word limit for letters.
Comments
There were no comments