Communities

Follow Us

Twitter

ValleyIndy - about 49 minutes ago.

Commodore Hull - the original Valley bad a** http://t.co/OqcdHL3P

ValleyIndy - about 3 hours, 34 minutes ago.

Derby Dems say -- "Show the world the settlement." Read the letter. http://t.co/25zAnZwm

ValleyIndy - about 4 hours, 1 minute ago.

The Derby Democratic Town Committee just delivered a letter to Mayor Anthony Staffieri saying the public should... http://t.co/4U7JMowq

We Read…

Government

Community

Fire Departments

School Districts

‘Keep Oxford Green’ Pushes Affordable Housing Issue

by Mike Russo | Oct 20, 2009 12:00 pm

(3) Comments | Commenting has expired | Send link to a friend | E-mail the Author

Posted to: Oxford, Election 2009, Oxford Election

Photo: Mike Russo

More than 150 residents attended a rally Saturday against high-density housing in town.

The rally was organized by “Keep Oxford Green,” a political action committee founded by residents Ed and Tanya Carver.

The group opposes low-income and high-density housing in town, such as condos and apartments.

Saturday’s rally was held at Carver’s business, Oxford Science, Inc., on Christian Street.

Meanwhile, opponents to the rally planted signs across the street, accusing the organizers of spreading lies.

Carver said the new group has bi-partisan support in town.

Carver also works with Augie Palmer, the former Republican first selectman who is now running for a seat on the town’s Planning and Zoning Commission.

The connection has opponents questioning the new group’s motives.

“Their honesty is to be questioned,” First Selectman Mary Ann Drayton-Rogers said. “They are organized under a PAC just to get Augie Palmer elected to the Planning and Zoning Commission.”

However, Palmer and the Keep Oxford Green organizers say they are merely trying to protect Oxford’s rural nature.

Since August, Keep Oxford Green has been spreading that message through a Web site, signs and fliers mailed to residents.

“We are not against affordable housing, but high density and low-income housing,” Ed Carver said.

However, the group’s Web site, in its “about us” section, says:

“Affordable housing is not good for Oxford tax payers.”

The “about us” section concludes with, “The only good that will come will be affordable housing for those constructing and renting the apartments.”

Photo: Mike RussoCurrently, 1.3 percent of Oxford’s housing stock is considered affordable.

According to state mandates presented publicly by Town Planner Brian Miller in June, the minimum density requirements for affordable housing call for 6 units per acre for single-family dwellings, 10 units per acre for duplex housing and 20 units per acre on multi-family housing in accordance with smart growth principles.

Click here to read the state’s law on affordable housing.

Click here to read the problems one regional planning agency has with the state’s policy on affordable housing.

Click here to read a story from the NY Times about how the state’s affordable housing regulations can be used against towns.

Click here to read about affordable housing in the town’s 2007 Plan of Conservation and Development.

Keep Oxford Green leaders said extrapolating the information provided in June could result in Oxford being overrun with high-density housing, including four-story apartment buildings.

Again, it is an accusation the current administration denies.

The group’s Web site, meanwhile, under a section titled “high density housing,” shows an outdated photo of Derby’s Main Street.

At Saturday’s rally, Augie Palmer, who is stepping down from the Board of Selectmen to run for the Planning and Zoning Commission, said he has been against smart growth principles throughout his political career.

Palmer said apartments would be destructive to Oxford.

“It is going to hurt the schools and residents property investments,” he said.

According to Carver, a 2005 survey in the Oxford Plan of Conservation and Development — the town’s blue print for future growth — shows 84 percent of residents want to have a rural environment while 76 percent want single family homes in Oxford.

Photo: Mike Russo“It says this is not what we want, and the hierarchy has forgotten that,” he said.

“The POCD is saying to keep the town rural and control growth, and this administration is not listening to that,” said David Haversat, the Republican nominee for First Selectman. “This should raise a red flag.”

Haversat blamed Democrats for placing “nasty” signs calling Keep Oxford Green “liars” along Christian Street during the event.

Earlier this year, the Planning and Zoning Commission was awarded a $50,000 state grant to study feasible affordable housing areas along the Route 67 corridor and develop regulations.

They dropped the study in August due to political fallout. (See story)

Planning and Zoning Chairman Vinny Vizzo, who is running for re-election, said he is against affordable housing in town, but stressed that the town has to change with the times or will find itself “going broke” in court.

Vizzo’s commission was forced to examine affordable housing rules in town because they are being sued by a developer whose application was rejected.

Putting something on the books regarding affordable housing town would give Oxford more leverage when a developer proposes it — as it stands, the town has no regulations either way.

Click here to see minutes from a June 18 workshop where the Planning and Zoning Commission explained the town’s affordable housing situation.

“Keep Oxford Green is blowing this way out of proportion,” he said. “They are lying to the public, and the commission just wants to see the town protected.”

There have been several projects proposed that would offer affordable housing in Oxford, including one for a manufactured (mobile home) home project near the Waterbury-Oxford Airport.

The town rejected the plan.

It is now before the courts and a decision could come by Oct. 30, town officials said.

Share this story with others.

Share |

Comments

posted by: Oxforddemocrat on October 20, 2009  2:23pm

The Oxford Republican’s sole issue in the election, Affordable Housing,is a phony non-issue, since municipalities have no opportunity to oppose Affordable Housing other than abide by CT state regulations governing
this issue.  When a developer proposes an Affordable Housing project in a town and the town denies it, the developer files an appeal under the CT Affordable Housing Land Use Appeals Act (CT Gen. Stat. 8-30g). The
municipality must prove that the denial was “necessary to protect public interests in health and safety and such public interests clearly outweigh the need for Affordable housing”.  But zoning decisions based on
insubstantial reasons aimed at excluding affordable housing are overturned by the Court.  Communities which already have at least 10% of the housing is available to moderate income families are exempt from the
>> application of this statute. Presently only 1.3% of Oxford’s housing is considered affordable.

So, why does the Oxford GOP try to confuse the electorate by saying that they will “Keep Oxford Green by keeping Affordable Housing out of town”? I believe it is a combination of ignorance of the appropriate laws and
and calculated deception to keep their only issue alive.  If they are so inept in their understanding of laws in this matter, do you really want them elected to manage the affairs of Oxford.

posted by: Oxforddemocrat on October 20, 2009  2:26pm

It’s also important for people believing these inaccurate statements to remember that Mr. Palmer is employed by Mr. Carver and Mr. Palmers wife contributed $300.00 to this PACV. Mr. Carver claims that Palmer knew nothing about it. Does he and Palmer people really believe this nonsense and Palmer’s not being involved in all of this. Come on now! were not that dumb!

posted by: pigfarmer on October 20, 2009  6:15pm

Palmer and his boy with cash (Eddie C.) have clearly twisted this issue for their own gain. The republican-controlled PZC saw the need for the grant, applied for it, and then canned it after the KOG ‘ers got the public confused. The Oxford PZC clearly sees the need for regulations in order to oppose or control an affordable housing grant. The seven members of the PZC are the only ones who have formally voted to OPPOSE an affordable application. Palmer and Carver are liars and are prejudiced against minority groups and the less-privileged.  Their behavior is morally reprehensible.

Events Calendar

SeeClickFix »

Liability of Roadway Condition-EastMain
May 23, 2012 12:45 pm
Address: 499-599 E Main St Ansonia, CT
Rating: 3

Started at my new employer adjacent to East Main Street. Exiting my building and walking across East...

more »
Unable to see oncoming traffic
May 18, 2012 8:32 am
Address: Prindle Ave At Academy Hill Road Derby, CT
Rating: 1

The grasses at the end of Prindle need to be cut. Its impossible to see cars coming UP...

more »
murder
May 16, 2012 9:26 pm
Address: Elizabeth St Derby, CT
Rating: 1

WHERES ALL THE POLICE PATROLS !!!! I GET HOME AFTER DARK ! HAVE NOT SEEN A POLICE CAR OR FOOT PATROL

Flyerboard

Sponsors

Knight Foundation Valley Foundation The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven

Sponsors have no input into or responsibility for articles published on this site.

V.I.S. Site Design & Development

smartpill design